|
J. Kepler
|
The packing will be the tightest possible,
so that in no other arrangement could more
pellets be stuffed into the same container.
|
|
D. Hilbert
|
How can one arrange most densely in space an infinite
number of equal solids of given form, e.g.,
spheres with given radii..., that is,
how can one so fit them together that the ratio of the filled
to the unfilled space may be as great as possible?
(Hilbert's Problem 18, part C, 1900).
|
|
S. Singh
|
Of all the problems likely to replace Fermat's Last Theorem as the
greatest unsolved problem in mathematics the best candidate is
Kepler's sphere-packing problem. - S. Singh in Fermat's Last Theorem.
|
|
R. Kargon
|
Hariot advised Kepler to abstract himself
mathematically into an atom in order to
enter `Nature's house'. In his reply of 2 August 1607,
Kepler declined to follow Harriot, ad atomos et
vacua. Kepler preferred to think of the reflection-refraction
problem in terms of the union of two
opposing qualities--transparence and opacity. Hariot was surprised.
`If those assumptions and
reasons satisfy you, I am amazed.'
|
|
H.S.M. Coxeter
|
The densest lattice-packing is not necessarily the densest packing.
A first suspicion in this direction arises from the existence of
equally dense non-lattice packings: the hexagonal close packing and
also several hybrids.
|
|
C. A. Rogers
|
While many mathematicians believe, and all physicists know, that the
density cannot exceed pi/sqrt(18)=0.74048..., the best properly
established bound known [before 1958] seems to have been the bound 0.828,...
obtained by Rankin.
|
|
D. J. Muder
|
It's one of those problems that tells us that we are not as smart as
we think we are.
|
|
Jean-Michel Kantor
|
Hilbert's text gives the impression that he did not anticipate the success and the developments this
problem would have.
|
|
W. Kahan
|
The Directed roundings can be used to implement Interval Arithmetic,
which is a scheme that approximates every variable not by one value
of unknown reliability but by two that are guaranteed to straddle
the ideal value. This scheme is not so popular in the U.S.A. as it is
in parts of Europe, where some people distrust computers.
|
|
C. A. Rogers
|
Little precise is known about the packing density in three or more
dimensions.
|
|
L. Fejes Tóth
|
Thus it seems that the problem can be reduced to the
determination of the minimum of a function of a finite
number of variables, providing a programme realizable in principle.
In view of the intricacy of this function we
are far from attempting to determine the exact minimum.
But, mindful of the rapid development of our
computers, it is imaginable that the minimum may be approximated
with great exactitude.
|
|
J. Milnor
|
For 2-dimensional disks this problem has been solved by Thue and
Fejes Toth,.. However, the corresponding problem in 3 dimensions
remains unsolved. This is a scandalous situation since the
(presumably) correct answer has been known since the time of Gauss.
|
|
J. Milnor
|
All that is missing is a proof.
|
|
S. Singh
|
It
looks simple at first sight, but reveals its subtle horrors to those
who try to solve it.
|