Next: FTC solves the simplest
Up: Internet Calculus II
Previous: Problems
- Let
.
Find
and
.
Show that
is an increasing function of
.
Show that
has one point of inflection.
By
, we have:
is always positive, so the function
is increasing.
We have:
-
, for
, so the graph of
is concave down for
.
-
,
-
, for
, so the graph of
is concave up for
.
So the graph of
changes concavity, going through
.
So
is a point of inflection.
- Let
.
Find the critical points, local maxima and minima and points of inflection of the graph of
.
We have, using
and the product rule:
The only critical point is
.
Since
, the graph of
is concave up at
, so
is a local minimum.
We have:
-
, for
, so the graph of
is concave up for
.
-
,
-
, for
and for
, so the graph of
is concave down for
and for
.
So the graph of
changes concavity, going through
.
So
are the only inflection points.
- Let
.
Find
.
We have
, where
and
.
By
, we have
.
By the chain rule, we have:
- A student writes the following solution to the integral problem:
By FTC, we have:
where
.
Since
, we may take
.
Then we have:
Is something wrong and if so, what?
There must be something wrong, because the integrand is a positive function, so the integral ought to be positive.
Looking at the integral, we see that the integration region goes through the origin and near the origin the integrand
gets
arbitrarily large.
Then our usual approach to the integral breaks down and
is not valid for the such integrals.
In fact, we shall see later that the integral does not exist.
- Calculate the following definite integrals:
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
Alternatively we might note that
will do, since by the Chain rule, it has the correct derivative.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
Alternatively we might note that
will do, since by the Chain rule, it has the correct derivative.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
Alternatively we might note that
will do, since by the Chain rule, it has the correct derivative.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is:
.
-
.
The function
is negative in the interval
and is positive in the interval
.
So we split the integral into two pieces:
To do the integrals, we first find
such that
.
Then
and
, so the integral is
.
We may take
.
Then
,
and
, so we get:
Note that this is quite different from
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is
.
-
.
We first find
such that
.
So
will do.
Then by
the integral is:
-
.
We first find
, such that:
.
So
will do.
Then by
, the integral is:
-
.
We first find
, such that:
.
So
will do.
Then by
, the integral is:
-
.
- Let
.
Find the critical points and local maxima and minima of the function
and give a rough plot of its graph.
By
, we have
.
Then by the chain rule, we have:
.
The critical points occur when
, so when
, so when
, for some non-negative integer
, so when
, so when
.
When
, we have
.
- First consider the critical point
.
We have
, so the second derivative test is inapplicable.
However
for small
,
is approximately
, so when
is small and non-zero,
is approximately
so
is small and positive, for
near zero.
So
is increasing near
, so the critical point
is an inflection point.
- When
is even and positive,
is positive at the critical point
, so this is a local minimum.
- When
is odd and positive,
is negative at the critical point
, so this is a local maximum.
- When
is even and positive,
is negative at the critical point
, so this is a local maximum.
- When
is odd and positive,
is positive at the critical point
, so this is a local minimum.
So we have local maxima at
and at
.
Also we have local minima at
and at
.
Finally, making the change from
to
, with
, so provided
is positive,
we
have, for
:
Then the change in
from the local max at
to the local max at
is, for
and
a positive
integer:
Here we have used the fact that
, for any real
.
Since
is decreasing on its domain, the factor
is positive, as is the term
, in the interval
.
So the difference between adjacent maxima is negative.
So the local maxima form a decreasing sequence (when
).
Similarly we can show that the local minima, for
form an increasing sequence, each local minimum is below all the local maxima and the gap
between the local maxima and minima shrinks to zero as
.
So the graph oscillates forever with ever decreasing oscillations,
so has a horizontal asymptote given by
.
A computer gives this value as
.
It gets to this value rather slowly, however: again the computer gives:
Compared with
, we see that even at
, there is agreement only up to six decimal places!
- Show that the mean value of the velocity of a particle moving along the
-axis over a time interval
is equal to the average
velocity over that time interval: i.e.
, where
.
By definition, the mean of the velocity is:
Here we have used
.
- Use the double angle formulas:
to determine the integrals:
We first note that since
, we have
.
So it suffices to do the first integral.
We have:
Now
has the derivative
.
So by
, we have:
So
, so
also.
- Using
, calculate the mean value
and find
, such that
for the following functions:
Using
, calculate the mean value
and find
, such that
for the following functions and compare with your previous
numerical estimates:
-
on
.
Now
has the derivative
, so by
, we get:
This agrees with our previous estimate exactly.
-
on
.
Now
has the derivative
, so by
, we get:
Again, this agrees with our previous estimate exactly.
-
on
.
Now
has the derivative
, so by
, we get:
So our previous estimate of
was fairly close.
Next: FTC solves the simplest
Up: Internet Calculus II
Previous: Problems
George A. J. Sparling
2002-01-27