Next: Definition of finiteness
Up: Finiteness09february2012
Previous: Injections into
- (C)
Let a non-empty set
be given.
Suppose that there exists, for some
a surjection
.
Then either
is a bijection, or
and there exists a surjection
.
Proof:
If
, then
and any map from
to any non-empty set has range a single element, so if the map is surjective,
must be a one-element set, in which case the map
is also injective so
is bijective and we are done.
So henceforth we may assume that
and that
is not a bijection, since otherwise we are done.
Since
is not a bijection,
is not injective, so there exist
and
in
such that
and yet
, say, where
.
Define the map
by the composition
.
Then since
is a bijection, the map
, being a composition of surjections, is a surjection.
Note that we have
and
, say, where
and
, since
and
is injective.
So
and
.
Now the map
obeys
and
.
Define
as the restriction to
of the map
.
Then since
and
and
, we see that:
So
is a surjection and we are done.
Then, by POW, we have the corollary:
- (D)
Let a non-empty set
be given.
Suppose that there exists, for some
a surjection
.
Then either
is a bijection, or
and there exists a positive integer
and a bijection
.
Proof:
Here
is the least integer such that an surjection
exists.
Then
is bijective, since otherwise we could lower the integer
, by (C).
Next: Definition of finiteness
Up: Finiteness09february2012
Previous: Injections into
George A. J. Sparling
2012-02-09