Next: The equivalence relation of
Up: Finiteness09february2012
Previous: Cantor's Bijection Theorem
Let
be a set.
- A relation on
is a subset
of
.
- The empty relation on
is the subset
of
.
- The full relation on
is the subset
of
.
- The identity relation on
is the subset
of
. Note that if
, then
, for a unique subset
of
.
If
is a relation on
and if
, we often write
.
- The transpose
of a relation on
is the set
. Then
is a relation on
and we have
.
We have
if and only if
.
- If
and
are relations on a set
, then their composition
is the set:
Then
is a relation on
.
We have
if and only if
and
, for some
.
We abbreviate the composition
by
.
The composition of relations is associative: for example, if
,
and
are relations on
we may put:
Then we have, for any relations
,
and
on
:
In general, we may compose relations successively, without using parentheses.
In particular, for any relation
on
and for any positive integer
, we may construct the
-fold composition of
with itself, giving the relation
, with
and
.
Notice that
consists of chains of successively related elements of
:
A relation
on a set
is said to be:
- Reflexive, if and only if
, if and only if
for all
.
- Symmetric, if and only if
, if and only if
implies that
.
- Anti-symmetric, if and only if
, if and only if whenever
, then
.
- Transitive, if and only if
, if and only if whenever
and
, then
.
There are many special kinds of relations
on a set
:
- A relation
on
is said to be a function if and only if whenever
and
, then
, if and only if
.
Then
, for some unique subset
of
, called the range of
.
Also we have
, for some unique subset
of
.
Then the set
, called the domain of
.
- If
is a function on
, then
is said to be surjective if and only if it has range
if and only if
.
- If
is a function on
, then
is said to be injective if and only if
is also a function if and only if
and
.
- If
is a function with domain
and with
, then
is said give a well-defined function from
to
.
is an surjection from
to
if and only if
and
.
is an injection from
to
if and only if
. and
.
is an bijection from
to
if and only if
and
. In this case
is a bijection from
to
.
- A relation
on
is a bijection from
to itself, if and only if we have
.
- If
and
are functions on
, so are
and
(although one of both of these may be empty relations).
-
is a partial order if and only if
is anti-symmetric and transitive.
-
is a total order if and only if
is a partial order and trichotomy holds:
.
-
is an equivalence relation if and only if
is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Let
be any relation on
.
Put
.
Then
is symmetric and reflexive.
Then put
.
Then
is an equivalence relation on
, called the equivalence relation generated by
.
Then we have
and
, for any relation
on
. If
is another relation on
, then
implies that
.
Also
is an equivalence relation if and only if
.
Also if
is any equivalence relation, such that
, then
.
So we have:
So the equivalence relation generated by
is the smallest subset of
that contains
as a subset and is an equivalence relation.
Note that if
, then the relation
on
is symmetric and transitive and the relation
is an equivalence relation on
.
Let now
be an equivalence relation on a set
.
- For each
define:
Then we have the properties:
-
and
.
-
is a symmetric and transitive relation on
.
- If
and
are elements of
such that
, or such that
, then we have
and
.
- We have
and
.
So given an equivalence relation
we may define:
Then we have shown that if
, then
is non-empty.
Also we have shown that if
and
are distinct elements of
then
.
Finally we have the formulas:
If
is a non-empty set a partition of
is a subset
of
, such that:
- If
and
are distinct elements of
, then
.
-
.
- Each element
of
is non-empty.
If
is an equivalence relation on
, then we have shown above that
is a partition of
.
Conversely, given a partition
of
, define a relation
on
by the formula:
Then
is an equivalence relation.
The main theorem is then:
- For any partition
of a set
, we have:
.
- For any equivalence relation
on a set
, we have:
.
Next: The equivalence relation of
Up: Finiteness09february2012
Previous: Cantor's Bijection Theorem
George A. J. Sparling
2012-02-09